Page 45 - April-May-2017
P. 45

influence is of the two yarn structures,
             ring and rotor.

             Yarn quality
             The quality criteria of the ring yarn shows
             that the spindle method gives somewhat
             better yarn results than the stripper
             method. With rotor yarn, no evident
             differences between the two harvesting
 Influence of the mechanical harvesting   methods are detectable.


 method on ring and rotor yarn up to   Knitted fabric comparisons
             The knitted fabrics made of rotor yarn
             have a far better evenness than those
 the end productuality  made of ring yarn. This means that the
             influence of the end spinning system on
             the knitted fabric quality is far higher than
 In a joint cooperation between the Cotton Institute of   costs, lower fuel consumption and higher harvest   the influence of the harvesting method.
 South Africa and Rieter, the two commonly used   yields, which, however, can increase the proportion of   Nevertheless, the positive influence of the
 methods of mechanical cotton harvesting were   immature fibres. Also known is that the cotton   spindle method, at least with one farmer,
 compared with each other. The comprehensive test   harvested with the stripper picker exhibits a higher   is recognisable even in knitted fabric
 and its results are available in a special print. Here   seed coat content.  made of rotor yarn.
 are a few interesting extracts from the project.

 Cotton is still the dominant staple fibre. In Africa 1.4
 million tons of cotton were produced 2013. That
 corresponds to about 5 % of global production. In
 South Africa, approx. 9 000 tons of cotton are
 harvested annually.

 Test conditions
 Two different methods of cotton harvesting were each
 examined at two different farmers. The comparison   Knits from rotor yarn, 100% cotton, Ne 24, 4.2 αe.
 was carried out through to the knitted fabric, whereby   The cotton harvested by the spindle method (left) contains fewer trash particles than the
 cotton harvested by the stripper method (right).
 carded ring and rotor yarns with various counts were   Fibre length  Comprehensive information in
 spun. Not only the yarns and knitted fabrics were   The fibre length, in particular short fibre ratio and   the special print
 tested but also interim products, to be able to better   mean fibre length, have a strong influence on the   The special print includes the complete,
 interpret the effects on the yarn and the knits.  yarn unevenness. Across the process line, a mean   comprehensive data and detailed
 staple 1 to 2 mm longer is seen with the spindle   explanations and background
 Mechanical harvesting methods  method compared to the stripper method. Thus, as   information. It can be ordered under
 Today there are two common mechanical methods   far as evenness is concerned, a positive result in the   rieter-link@rieter.com. Electronically, the
 for harvesting cotton – the spindle method and the   yarn and in the knitted fabric is also to be expected.   special print can be downloaded with the
 stripper method.   Also decisive here is, however, how great the   given QR code.










                   QR code for scanning and downloading the special
                    print. http://bit.ly/CottonHarvest_SA3011v1
 The mechanical cotton harvesting methods currently in use are the
 spindle and the stripper methods.
                      Author: Har ald Schwippl
 They differ in productivity and quality. The stripper   Head Technology - After Sales
 method has many advantages – lower investment
 Across the process stages, the spindle method exhibited a 1 – 2 mm longer mean staple.  harald.schwippl@rieter.com
   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50