Supporters see it as key to EU trade privileges; critics warn of overreach and duplication.
Pakistan’s textile and garment industry is deeply split over the implementation of the Pakistan Accord on Health and Safety, a legally binding agreement between global brands, unions, and local manufacturers. The Accord aims to prevent workplace accidents through stricter safety protocols—covering fire, electrical, and structural risks—but its rollout has ignited fierce debate across the sector.
Proponents argue the Accord is essential for sustaining Pakistan’s GSP+ status with the European Union, which grants duty-free market access contingent on labour and human rights compliance. Supporters contend that initial resistance is natural and that embracing international oversight will strengthen Pakistan’s competitiveness and reputation.
However, major industry associations remain wary. Pakistan Hosiery Manufacturers Association and PRGMEA argue the Accord duplicates existing standards, conflicts with local labour laws, and risks giving foreign auditors excessive leverage. They cite concerns about transparency and fairness, referencing Bangladesh’s earlier experience under a similar framework.
Despite the tension, over 140 global brands—including Marks & Spencer, Bestseller, and PVH—have signed the Pakistan Accord. Recent roundtables in Lahore drew participation from 50 brands and 30 suppliers, highlighting both optimism and anxiety. Some suppliers, view it as a growth opportunity, while others seek clearer financial and technical support for compliance.
Pakistani manufacturers already maintain high compliance standards. Yet the Accord’s success may hinge on balancing global trust with local ownership—ensuring safety reforms elevate rather than burden the nation’s most vital export industry.
